 |
DCFS Can Do Better |

|
Working for a Kinder, Gentler, Arkansas Division of Children
and Family Services
If you have reason to suspect that a child you know is being abused, please call the
Arkansas Child Abuse Hotline at 1-800-482-5964. Don't stop until you get an answer. |
What Are Our Goals?
Below are some of the procedures, policies, legislation, and
case worker equipment that we see a need for to emotionally protect our children before,
during, and after DCFS examinations and investigations of child maltreatment allegations,
while also supporting the mission of DCFS to physically protect our children. One of
the purposes of these items is to minimize the trauma to a child when a DCFS case worker
performs or considers performing a disrobing and possible photographing of a child during
the investigation of an allegation of abuse, and to minimize the after effects of such an
examination, while making sure that all options are pursued before resorting to such an
examination, with minimal relative impact on the case worker and DCFS, as compared with
the child's emotional well-being, in their effort to protect our children, which is our
common goal. Such an investigation must be carried out with care and concern to
limit the child's perception of isolation and violation, particularly when this procedure
is carried out by strangers.
This will be a continually evolving list, and we hope that
you can see a place where you can put your own talents and contacts to work in helping us
define, refine, and implement these goals to protect our children as well. Everyone
can do their part, including contacting
their state representatives and senators to encourage them to get on board to pass
this legislation and implement these policies. And, if you think some of these ideas
are far-fetched or unworkable or just plain stupid, please let us know that, too, and why you think so -
we certainly don't claim to be the experts! We would very much appreciate a dialog
with you to clear up any misconceptions and refine these ideas, or even drop them if we
see your point - we don't have a problem with that, at least as far as CAKiD is
concerned. And, if you also see some goals from your own perspective that we should
include, please let us know what you would
like to see done to improve child maltreatment investigations and examinations in
Arkansas.
- Enact Treating Children With
Dignity legislation prohibiting fully disrobing a child at or
over the age of 3 years old, or causing said child to be fully disrobed, when performing a
bodily examination by a DCFS case worker or their designate, codifying the section
entitled "Do not make the child disrobe completely" of the MidSOUTH New Worker
Training Participant Resource Manual handout entitled "Visual
Inspection of Children - Maintaining the Dignity of the Child" (edited July 1,
2003). To meet this standard, the waist band of the child's underwear (panties,
shorts, briefs, boxers, etc.) shall at all times be in contact with the front or back
portions of the child's waist at some point.
- Create a set of best caseworker practices standard
investigative procedures to be followed as defined for the individual aspects of the
investigation for which they are defined. These standards will be developed with
input from a Best Caseworker Practices Panel of experienced ("master") DCFS case
workers, child advocate groups (such as CAKiD and CASA), child social workers, child
psychologists, pediatricians, trauma experts, and/or others involved in children's issues
(professionals or the public). These will be reviewed annually by said Panel to
incorporate improvements in investigative techniques and best caseworker practices in the
field of child-related examinations and investigations. Any variance in these
procedures by a DCFS case worker in a case will be fully documented and the reasoning
behind the variance explained, which will be reviewed and approved by the case worker's
supervisor as it occurs, and will be included in said Panel's annual review for discussion
and possible modification of these standard procedures.
- Create an easy-to-carry flip chart, or equivalent, of common
investigative scenarios with the steps to follow based on the best caseworker practices
(see above) that the DCFS case workers can reference and follow. For example,
include a section containing the instructions from Visual Inspection
of Children - Maintaining the Dignity of the Child, as well as a section containing
age-appropriate forensic interviewing techniques, steps, sample questions and dialogs (see
course description below). Also include in it other reference information that the
case workers may need, such as phone numbers of the relevant agencies, courts, and law
enforcement contacts. (The State of Michigan has a similar pocket booklet that their
case workers and others carry.)
- Require that the DCFS case workers consult with and get the
signed approval of their supervisor and/or other designated authority as it occurs to
determine if partially or fully disrobing and possibly photographing a child is warranted
during the initial investigation from what they can see in a cursory, non-invasive,
examination, and from the initial interview of the child that they have just finished
with, before they proceed with such a violation of the child's privacy. This would
provide a much-needed check-and-balance system to guard against potentially unnecessary
and hasty decisions and actions which could affect the child for her or his entire
lifetime.
- After an invasive bodily examination, require that the DCFS
case workers counsel the children in an age appropriate manner that partially or fully
disrobing for an adult is not the normal thing that they should be doing. Otherwise,
the children may be left with an impression that could lead to others taking advantage of
them because of those inferred misconceptions, resulting in other violations to them at
later points in time.
- Have the DCFS case workers document all variances from the
Arkansas Child Maltreatment Act that occur during a child maltreatment allegation
investigation, such as when the times set forth in Arkansas Code 12-12-509 are
exceeded. This will include the type of variance (such as "Interview with child
did not take place within 72 hours of a Priority II report" or "Investigative
determination report (CFS-312) was not sent to parents or guardians within 30 days of the
initial report to the child abuse hotline (Central Intake)"), a narrative of why the
variance occurred, and a narrative from the case worker's perspective of what could have
been done to prevent the variance from occurring. This document will be reviewed and
approved by the case worker's supervisor as the variance occurs, and this information can
be used by the supervisor to dynamically balance the load between case workers under their
supervision. It will also be included in the Best Caseworker Practices Panel's
annual review for discussion and possible modification of the standard procedures.
The type of variance and the narrative of why the variance occurred will also be included
with the CFS-312, Child Maltreatment Assessment Determination Notification, that is sent
to the parents or guardians.
- Equip the DCFS case workers with camera-enabled cell
phones. These would be used to send photographs back to their supervisor and/or
other designated authority for consultation, as well as replacing the current 35mm film
cameras (or other current photographic equipment) in order to password encode, transmit,
and store the photographs taken during the examination in a case file database or in CHRIS
at DCFS. This would provide instant security for those photographs in that database,
would eliminate the current third-party development of the DCFS case worker's film (via
one-hour photo shops - we bet that surprises a lot of you, too!) in which non-authorized
personnel are able to view those sensitive photographs, and would eliminate unsecured
photographs being produced by or left in the camera.
- Equip the DCFS case workers with digital voice recorders in
order to record their interviews and other interactions with the child for evidentiary
requirements in hearings and court cases (which could reduce or eliminate the trauma of
testifying by the child during their re-living the event and the stress of
cross-examination), for use in the case worker's clarification of notes and reports about
the case, for review by the supervisor during the case review for signoff, for best case
worker practices reviews, and to be made available to the parents or guardians upon
request when the final report determination is mailed to them.
- Require that all pictures taken of a child will be destroyed
within 30 days of mailing the final report of the child's case to the parents or guardians
if the case will not be proceeding further in the judicial system, such as if the case is
ruled unsubstantiated or if the case is ruled substantiated but perpetrator unknown.
This includes all photographs, negatives, and photographic image files on computers or
CD's or any and all other storage devices, or on any and all other photographic medium,
and any and all copies thereof, taken of a child during a DCFS investigation. A
carefully-drawn CFS-327a, Physical Documentation - Body Diagram, or equivalent should be
sufficient for long-term recordkeeping and meeting legal evidentiary requirements for any
future investigations (additional legislation may need to be enacted to make such diagrams
to be sufficient for said evidence). Hiring a forensic artist may be required to
duplicate those injury patterns accurately enough on the CFS-327a body diagrams from the
photographic evidence for future reference or proceedings, or, acquiring computer software
that could overlay (or cut and paste) those injury portions of the photographs onto the
CFS-327a may also be suitable, just so full or partial pictures of the child in which the
child can be identified are destroyed. The child would then not be further
victimized and traumatized in the knowledge that nude or semi-nude photographs exist of
them. Furthermore, the child would be protected from potential violations by others
accessing the child's files to satisfy their own prurient interests or from theft of the
photographs themselves.
- Have DCFS make a good faith effort to inform the parents or
guardians of a child before partially or fully disrobing and possible photographing of the
child takes place during an investigation, and to make a good faith effort to obtain
consent from them before said disrobing and possible photographing takes place (whether or
not they agree to the consent request). The parents or guardians would then know
what was happening to their child and would be able to try to prepare themselves to calm
the child when they came to pick the child up. They would also be allowed to give an
explanation and other facts (such as side effects of medication that the child is on, such
as susceptibility to bruising) to the case worker that may be sufficient for the case
worker to then conclude that the disrobing and possible photographing was not
necessary. And, any concern about flight with the child should the parents or
guardians be suspect is alleviated by the child being in the custody of the case worker at
the time of the examination, and they would find out anyway soon thereafter when they next
spoke with the child. (Note: This will supercede current legislation which prevents
the case worker from informing the parents or guardians in the case where one of them is
the suspected abuser.)
- Form an organization of child advocate volunteers, similar to
CASA, to go out with the DCFS case workers on their interviews with and examinations of
the child to act as a buffer between the child and the case worker and to advocate on the
child's behalf. Consider the case of a DCFS case worker interviewing the child and
the day care director who phoned in the initial child maltreatment allegation report
acting as a witness during the interview. Both of those individuals have a vested
interest in the case and have their own biases about what happened to the child that they
may or may not be trying to prove. The child needs someone in her or his corner that
doesn't have a vested interest in the case, but is only concerned with the child's
emotional and physical welfare, which role these child advocate volunteers would
fill. The child advocate volunteers will be required to attend training on DCFS
child maltreatment assessment investigations and procedures and related laws, as well as
training in forensic interviewing of children (see below). Because of
confidentiality rules covering child maltreatment investigations, this organization of
child advocate volunteers will require federal legislation and approval, similar to CASA
or as an amendment to the CASA legislation, so, please contact your US Senators and Representatives
to get them to write, sponsor and pass this legislation.
- Develop a course on age-appropriate forensic interviewing of
children, such as those techniques presented in the book, Investigative Interviews of
Children, by Debra Poole and Michael Lamb (1998), and described in Forensic Interviewing
Protocol by the State of Michigan (who has sent us their training material for their
1-day social worker training and their 2-day law enforcement and court-related training,
both of which are taught the same protocol by their prosecuting attorney's office).
Forensic interviewing focuses on the general ("tell me what happened") and
progresses to the specific only at the very last, and considers alternative hypotheses
from the start, rather than targeting the questioning based on the case worker's
preconception of what happened (i.e., trying to prove a specific scenario). This
course would probably be developed by (or helped formulated by) and taught by MidSOUTH
Training, which currently trains the DCFS case workers, CASA volunteers, and mandated
public reporters, and would be open to DCFS case workers, CACD officers, and CAKiD
volunteers. (Legislative approval and funding would be required to create and
present this class, just as it is required for the other classes taught by MidSOUTH
Training.)
We at [the Children and Family Services Division] do a lot of
things well. We really do. But we also have some things that we can do
better.
Roy Kindle, Director, DCFS; Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, June 9,
2003 |
Home What's Wrong Please Help Encounters
New CASA
Investigations
Stories
Laws
Procedures
Goals Need Information
Acronyms Group Links
Related Pages
Contact Us
You Are Visitor
Number |
|
This Page Was
Last Updated on
12/02/04 |
CAKiD - Working for a kinder, gentler, DCFS.